Question: My question is whether there a much greater risk factor when considering between two stallions that differ in the fact that one has many proven mares and was a very good performer himself, while the other is a young stallion that is well-bred but has never raced because of an injury, and doesn’t yet have a large number of offspring? The two stallions give a similar nick rating. I have a case like this where I’m trying to make a decision about cost vs quality. I should mention the tried and proven stallion is quite a bit more expensive of course. — Garrie (More…)
Written by Alan Porter | August 2nd, 2008
Q: I was looking for nicks with a mare by Abaginone. Your reports show an A++ for a Seeking the Gold/Halo crossing but all the stakes winners listed are by one sire, Mutakddim, out of Southern Halo mares bred in Argentina. Is this a statistical quirk or a valid basis for generalizing about a Seeking the Gold/Halo nick?
A: Thank you for the question. The calculation for a mare by a son of Seeking the Gold out of mares from the Halo line is (More…)
Written by Alan Porter | June 27th, 2008
Alan responds to a few readers’ questions…
Q: Are there any downfalls to nicking?
A: Nick ratings are a measurement of (More…)
Written by Alan Porter | June 2nd, 2008
You asked, Alan answers! (Part (V) (More…)
Written by Alan Porter | April 26th, 2008
You asked, Alan answers! (Part (IV) (More…)
Written by Alan Porter | April 25th, 2008
You asked, Byron answers! (Part (III) (More…)
Written by Byron Rogers | April 24th, 2008
You asked, Alan answers! (Part (II) (More…)
Written by Alan Porter | April 24th, 2008